New: independent coding checks for insurers and providers. See how Lens works →

Coding everyone can trust

Autonomous coding for hospitals. Independent coding checks for insurers and health funds. The same evidence behind every code.

A claim is only as good as its coding. When codes drift from the record, hospitals miss funding they earned, and insurers can't tell what they're paying for.

Two products, one standard of evidence

Coding produces the codes. Lens checks them, wherever they came from. Both show the line in the record behind every result.

For hospitals and health centers

MEDIKODI Coding

Reads the record and codes every episode, with the evidence beside each code, grouping as it goes, and audit built into the workflow.

Explore Coding

For insurers, health funds and providers

MEDIKODI Lens

Upload one case or a full extract and get an independent read on the coding: what the record supports, what it doesn't, and what's worth a second look.

Explore Lens

Built for both sides of the claim

Providers

  • CodingLens

    Hospitals

    Clear the discharged-not-billed backlog and claim the funding your documentation supports.

    Explore: Hospitals
  • CodingLens

    Health centers

    Give a small coding team the reach of a large one, and the numbers to show its quality.

    Explore: Health centers

Funders

Start with data you already have

No integration project and nothing to install. See what MEDIKODI finds on your own episodes before you commit to anything.

For hospitals and health centers

A retrospective review

Send us a quarter of closed episodes. We code them blind and compare the result with what was billed, so you see what was missed and what was overclaimed.

Request a retrospective review →

For insurers and health funds

A sample of claims

Upload a sample of hospital claims to Lens. Each one comes back with the codes the record supports, the ones it doesn't, and the reason for every finding.

Join the Lens pilot →

Nothing to take on trust

Security & trust →
  • Evidence on every result

    Every code and every finding carries the line in the record behind it.

  • De-identified before AI

    Sensitive details are reduced before processing, and only what's needed is used.

  • People make the call

    Coders sign off the codes, and reviewers decide on every finding.

Questions & answers

The questions hospital and health fund leaders ask first.

What's the difference between Coding and Lens?

MEDIKODI Coding codes a hospital's episodes, with audit built into its own workflow. MEDIKODI Lens is separate: it checks coding that's already been done, by anyone, one case or a whole extract at a time.

Do you work for hospitals or for insurers?

Both, on the same terms. The same rules and classification versions apply whoever uses MEDIKODI, so a code or a finding means the same thing on either side of the claim. Each customer's data is kept separate.

Does Lens only look for over-coding?

No. It reports both directions: codes the record doesn't support, and documented care that wasn't coded. The two are reported separately, so neither hides the other.

How do we get started?

With data you already have. Hospitals can request a retrospective review of closed episodes. Insurers and health funds can send a sample of claims to the Lens pilot. Get in touch and we'll set it up.

See it on your own charts.